Reverse Domain Name Hijacking Information

Domaining site recommended by Domaining.com

RDNH Panels

(This table is no longer updated as of April 9, 2021.  Information on panelists who have made RDNH findings and the lawyers who represented the respondents in those cases can be found at UDRP.tools.

The table below includes cases for several years prior to April 2021, but not the oldest disputes where RDNH was found.)

Explanation of Notes:

Resp. Rep. – Respondent’s Representative
P– Presiding Panelist
S – Sole Panelist
maj – against RDNH – one of the two panelists who made a majority finding against RDNH
maj – for RDNH – one of the two panelists who made a majority finding of RDNH
min – against RDNH – the only panelist of the three who would have made a finding against RDNH
min – for RDNH – the only panelist of the three who would have made a finding for RDNH
unnamed dissenter on panel – one of the panelists would not have found RDNH but we don’t know which one
unnamed panelist in favor of RDNH – one of the panelists would have made a finding of RDNH but we don’t know which one
no response – RDNH found despite the respondent not filing a response
self – the respondent represented itself
The Respondent’s Representative is not always mentioned in the decision, so this field is left blank for many cases.  The Respondent’s Representative is only listed once for three-member panels on the same record as the presiding panelist, or in cases where the majority did not make a finding of RDNH the Respondent’s Representative is listed on the same record as the dissenting panelist who would have made a RDNH finding.